Home Page About the Trust Home Page Flood Mitigation Home Page Sustainable Water Home Page Water Quality Home Page Vegetation Home Page
PROJECTS: On-site stormwater detention
Download Now

 

On-site Stormwater Detention (OSD) is a way of ensuring that changes in land use do not cause more downstream flooding: both in the local drainage system immediately downstream and along the creeks and rivers further downstream.

Why Does development increase flooding downstream?

Most urban flooding is caused when the volume of stormwater runoff (which is what we call rainwater after it lands on the ground or other sealed surfaces and starts to flow downhill) is too large for the drainage pipes or watercourses to carry. The extra stormwater breaks out of the pipe or watercourse and flows through adjoining low lying areas. This may cause considerable damage to both property and buildings.

The most common changes in land use in this catchment are the change from rural uses to urban development and from low density to higher density development. These changes affect runoff in two ways:-

1. the increase in sealed areas means that the volume of runoff is greater

picture of roads/paving

2. better drainage causes quicker runoff

picture stormwater drains/gutter with water

This means that there is a greater volume of runoff delivered to the drains and creeks in a shorter time, which results in higher flow rates and higher flood levels downstream.

What is On-site Stormwater Detention?

In this system, water is stored on the grassed area and in a tank underground.


On-site Stormwater Detention (OSD) is a way of ensuring that changes in land use do not cause more downstream flooding: both in the local drainage system immediately downstream and along the creeks and rivers further downstream.

OSD restricts the rate that stormwater leaves a site to a discharge which will not cause increased flooding anywhere downstream. It involves temporarily storing (detaining) the excess stormwater on the site.

OSD is not the only way to ensure that developments do not make flooding worse, but in an already-urbanised catchment, it is often the only practical alternative.

There are approximately 1000 OSD systems installed in the Upper Parramatta River catchment. The Upper Parramatta River Catchment Trust employs a Stormwater Inspector to inspect these OSD systems and advises owners on their maintenance.

History of OSD in the Upper Parramatta River Catchment

When the Trust was established in 1989, after a series of major floods, there was concern that the magnitude of the existing flooding problem was continuing to grow. The OSD policy was instituted to stop flooding getting worse. This means that when flood mitigation works are undertaken to deal with the existing flooding problems, the solution is permanent.

The OSD policy was formulated by the Development Control Working Party which includes staff from the Trust and the four local councils in this catchment. The Working Party meets every 3-4 months to review the OSD policy and its operation. The Upper Parramatta River Catchment Trust carried out computer studies in 1991 to determine catchment-wide OSD parameters. The first edition of the Trust's OSD Handbook was then prepared and a common OSD policy for the catchment was adopted by all four local councils in November 1991. Since then, OSD has been imposed as a condition on most development consents.

The Trust now employs a Stormwater Inspector who inspects OSD systems and advises owners on how to their maintain systems

Components of an OSD System

There are different types of OSD systems, but they all have the following components: -

  • Discharge control pit
  • Storage
  • Collection network

Discharge Control Pit

The discharge control pit is located at the lowest point on the site and all flows leaves the site through this pit. The pit contains an orifice (circular hole) in a stainless steel plate fixed to the side wall. The orifice is sized to limit discharge from the site to the maximum permissible rate.

Storage

The Storage can be located on the surface, underground or on a roof. It detains the excess runoff that cannot immediately pass through the orifice. The storage fills by overflow from the discharge control pit and empties quickly though the pit once the rain eases.

Collection Network

The collection network consists of gutters, pits, pipes and surface grading. It delivers all site runoff to the discharge pit. The collection network must carry all run-off: even in the event of a 100-year storm. Run-off from upstream properties must be diverted around the OSD storage.

What would happen if there was no OSD?

If there was no OSD: -

  • there would be more frequent surcharge of local drains
  • there would be further bank erosion of local creeks
  • downstream flooding would get steadily worse
  • completed flood mitigation works would become less effective
  • the community would suffer increased flooding
  • local councils would be forced to spend more on further flood works
  • developers would have passed on the cost of dealing with the increased run-off to the rest of the community or council

The benefits of OSD?

OSD ensures that development does not worsen downstream flooding. It solves the problem of extra runoff at its source when development occurs. OSD also avoids the difficulty of predicting where future developments will occur. It is a user-pays system, so the cost will not be passed on to the rest of the community. As well, OSD preserves the effectiveness of existing flood mitigation and drainage works. OSD may also avoid the need for upgrading downstream drains.

The disadvantages of OSD?

OSD requires higher construction standards than are usual for stormwater and can add to the cost of developments. OSD systems need regular inspections by councils and the Trust. It can often be difficult to get owners to maintain their OSD systems and there is a need for ongoing education and changes in long-held community attitudes. The effect of the individual OSD system is small, but the cumulative effect is great.

What are the alternatives to OSD?

Possible alternatives to OSD include:

  1. In green fields developments, community flood retarding basins on public land are generally preferred to OSD on individual lots. The disadvantages of these basins in the catchment are that use of land is restricted and there are very few suitable sites available.
  2. Re-developments or infill developments in already urbanised areas are the usual form of development in the Upper Parramatta River catchment. Some options are: infiltration trenches; upgrading the hydraulic capacity of pipes, creeks and bridges; and small flood basins on private land. Upgrading downstream creeks, pipes and bridges is very expensive, may harm the environment and aggravates downstream flooding. Basins on private land can be ugly, difficult to maintain and pose safety concerns. Infiltration trenches can become ineffective due to surface clogging and soil heave can damage nearby buildings.

In many already-urbanised areas, OSD is the only practical alternative. A majority of local councils in the Sydney region now have an OSD policy.

How do I get further information?

The Trust has developed an OSD Handbook to assist designers and builders of OSD systems to provide the most cost effective OSD solutions. The 4th edition of the OSD Handbook is now available. To obtain a hard copy or to get further information about OSD, please email or call John Carse at the Trust on (02) 9891 4633. Handbooks cost $44 AUS (includes GST). Alternatively download a PDF version of the handbook (3rd and 4th editions available) or the "What is OSD?" brochure.

OSD can be incorporated into landscaping

 

 







Trust logo